MR LESSONG IN EXPLANATION.
-'•-•. Tc£tho Editor of the Evening Star. Sib,—After the injurious strictures passed upon me by. Mr. Warden Fraser, you will favor me by-uuaf&ing the following remarks as an act of justice to myself. I surveyed the Pakirarahi claim*which was rejectedjby thejDistrict Engineer, Mr McLaren, because the south boundary did not agree with Messrs Wright and Bayldon's survey of the, Taicua. Mr Bayldon re-surveyed the same, and on his plan the south boundary was, by. JI mistake, incorrectly delineated, causing a loss to the company of five men's ground (which, bye-the-bye, has since been pegged out). This plan was directly accepted by Mr McLaren, evidently without checking, the license granted, and the deed prepared from it. I had also surveyed the Star of the South joining the southern boundary of the Pakirarahi, jwhich was rejected and declared incorrect by the District Engineer,' 'because ifc.v:did riot agree with '.the incorrect' line of Mr Bayldon. When this mistake was found out through 1 me, an opportunity was afforded to Mr Bayldon to correct-it in the office. But how did Mr McLaren serve, me when in one of my plans :a clerical error occurred, where the figure 2 should have been 1 ? Why, he sent my plan with a note to the Warden, and when I desired to alter what was «vidently an error in copy, I was told to make another plan. . .-■;?- . Again, Scanlan's claim was surveyed by me, the plan rejected, resurveyed by Mr Bayldon, his plan accepted; and when compared with mine the difference is not appreciable. ■' . I could add much more to show that fair play is not aocorded to me and other surveyors on this field. If our plans" differ in bearing, &c.; from the gentlemen a whom I have mentioned, whose plans are - ■ invariably accepted (without checking) as correct, and any deviation therefrom— 'or . regard „ to connections with.Tdther surveyors' work—considered as an act of presumption and incapacity. I may add that for 20 years I bare followed the profession in Australia and New Zealand, serving both the General and Provincial Governments, and the Native Land Office ; that my plans have ■ been always found corretst, and that by heads of de« ■ partments, who, in .my-- humble. opinion - are of at least as high a professional standing as Mr McLaren. I would beg to remind that very zealous officer that plans by different surveyors will never join like the pieces of a child's puzzle. In Australia they allow a minimum error of 7 links in each allotment, but I suppose they must come to Mr McLaren to learn their business.—l«am, &c,,- ' L. LesSOXQJ _ . Surveyor.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750722.2.16.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2043, 22 July 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
437MR LESSONG IN EXPLANATION. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2043, 22 July 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.