Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MR LESSONG IN EXPLANATION.

-'•-•. Tc£tho Editor of the Evening Star. Sib,—After the injurious strictures passed upon me by. Mr. Warden Fraser, you will favor me by-uuaf&ing the following remarks as an act of justice to myself. I surveyed the Pakirarahi claim*which was rejectedjby thejDistrict Engineer, Mr McLaren, because the south boundary did not agree with Messrs Wright and Bayldon's survey of the, Taicua. Mr Bayldon re-surveyed the same, and on his plan the south boundary was, by. JI mistake, incorrectly delineated, causing a loss to the company of five men's ground (which, bye-the-bye, has since been pegged out). This plan was directly accepted by Mr McLaren, evidently without checking, the license granted, and the deed prepared from it. I had also surveyed the Star of the South joining the southern boundary of the Pakirarahi, jwhich was rejected and declared incorrect by the District Engineer,' 'because ifc.v:did riot agree with '.the incorrect' line of Mr Bayldon. When this mistake was found out through 1 me, an opportunity was afforded to Mr Bayldon to correct-it in the office. But how did Mr McLaren serve, me when in one of my plans :a clerical error occurred, where the figure 2 should have been 1 ? Why, he sent my plan with a note to the Warden, and when I desired to alter what was «vidently an error in copy, I was told to make another plan. . .-■;?- . Again, Scanlan's claim was surveyed by me, the plan rejected, resurveyed by Mr Bayldon, his plan accepted; and when compared with mine the difference is not appreciable. ■' . I could add much more to show that fair play is not aocorded to me and other surveyors on this field. If our plans" differ in bearing, &c.; from the gentlemen a whom I have mentioned, whose plans are - ■ invariably accepted (without checking) as correct, and any deviation therefrom— 'or . regard „ to connections with.Tdther surveyors' work—considered as an act of presumption and incapacity. I may add that for 20 years I bare followed the profession in Australia and New Zealand, serving both the General and Provincial Governments, and the Native Land Office ; that my plans have ■ been always found corretst, and that by heads of de« ■ partments, who, in .my-- humble. opinion - are of at least as high a professional standing as Mr McLaren. I would beg to remind that very zealous officer that plans by different surveyors will never join like the pieces of a child's puzzle. In Australia they allow a minimum error of 7 links in each allotment, but I suppose they must come to Mr McLaren to learn their business.—l«am, &c,,- ' L. LesSOXQJ _ . Surveyor.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750722.2.16.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2043, 22 July 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
437

MR LESSONG IN EXPLANATION. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2043, 22 July 1875, Page 2

MR LESSONG IN EXPLANATION. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2043, 22 July 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert