CORONERS' JURIES.
(To the Editor of the Evening Star.)
Sib,—There has been, at different times, a considerable amount of discussion regarding the manner, at presentin vogue, of picking Coroners' juries.' Generally speaking there is very little discrimina". ,tion exercised ; once it is decided that a case has arisen in which thY gratuitous services of twelve of Her Majesty's subjects .are required, a constable isFdespatched to serve summonses," and He is not at all particular as to whom he picks out of the list of his " eligible " acquaintances. -It may be asserted with confidence that in all cases this indifference,tor proper qualification is „ bad in principle^ as it is, perhaps very, often, unhappy-in-result; but in no case can the practice of promiscuous summonsing be more condemnable than in those where" jurors are required to be enlightened- iv someparticular direction. Thus .with mining, and'mining accidents.'/ It has .frequently occurred to me yhen observing the prqceedings of enquiries, of the kind} tb>t tb,o jurors r ,wer'o debarred." fron^ intelligently; considering their verdict because of their entire ignorance. When the inquest' upon Fox (killed in the Queen of Beanty mine) was held, the jury were composed to a great citent of shopkeepers and
others, wlio 'could.nok be'&u, posed^to.give, an unprejudiced c;nsidcration to tho question "hotf iFbxjmeV"vvitu his death." Having to rely chiefly on the witnesses for information—not only of the manner of the i accident j! hut if of the, probahlc chances &f '-'Hi hevig ftraceablb" 'to" somo one's neglect, they may often he misled. How much better would it be to select a dozen practical men' fbr'such duly. Say n jury of mine managers, or men experienced in the mining industry,-.. In thai; .caso. 'ilk« juriy'Vwiould be enabled to consider intelligmlly, uud<rst;\nding the bearings of thtf question requiring their decision; and tho-conclusion arrived at would always bo more sound—sound, simply because based upon some sort of authorityTgther]thittn tliatiObtaineclJsjecond hand. Although no provision has been made to direct tho choice of common juries, a greater discrimination might bo exercised with advantage.—Yours, etc. fc>UDDEK DjJATH.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750719.2.17.1
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2040, 19 July 1875, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
340CORONERS' JURIES. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 2040, 19 July 1875, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.