Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE CASE OF JOHN WINDSOR.

(To the Editor of the Evening Star.) Sib,— Referring to the letter inyour issue of yesterday, signed " John Windsor," allow me, as the person who drew your attention to Windsor's pitiable condition, to explain that the action I took in the matter was based on his own representation of his case to me. Previous to calling on you. I had a conversation with Windsor, in substance as follows ..:—

In reply to my question, had the Bright Smile Company or the contractors under whom he was working when h* received the accident done anything to assist him, he said, ''.Nothing, further than issuing some subscription lists;" and that Mr. Kennan bad S'.mesmall amount in hand which he had not received. I said I had not receired a list, but would be happy to do all I could to assist him and his family. Mr Windsor never gave me the slightest clue that the Bright Smile or any other company were making an effort in his behalf, and stated that he had a wife and four children, all the latter being ill with - measles. I offered to call at the offices of both local papers and represent his. case, when he thanked me, and we parted. I again saw Mr Windsor on Monday last, when he stated the Mayor offered to call a public meeting for the purpose of devising some means to relieve him and ' his family. . The Mayor informs me this day that he was not aware several companies had assisted him, as Windsor gave him to nil- -- derstand he had no means whatever. I am utterly at a loss to understand why Windsor should try to mislead me by -giving me to understand most distinctly that no effort had been made further than issuing a few subscription lists, when he must have been fully aware that several com- v panics had taken his case up. I am also at a loss .to understand his letter, and indeed the Jpoor man himself, as he has this day told me he was not aware of that clause in his letter where it is stated he " requested that the several subscriptions should be held over until such time as I should be enabled' to. get about and invest the same, &c. <fee." However, although I do not think. Mr Windsor has acted candidly with m», nether do I think he has shown his gratitude to the various companies who I now find assisted him, still I shall be only to glad too give my mite, and do my part in any movement started for the relief of his family.—l am, &c, S. E. Bichaeds. April 7th/1875.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18750407.2.15.1

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 1952, 7 April 1875, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
449

THE CASE OF JOHN WINDSOR. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 1952, 7 April 1875, Page 2

THE CASE OF JOHN WINDSOR. Thames Star, Volume VII, Issue 1952, 7 April 1875, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert