RE McAULIFFE'S BURIAL AND "DION SNIP."

Thames Star, Volume III, Issue 16610, 11 May 1874, Page 2

RE McAULIFFE'S BURIAL AND "DION SNIP."

j (To the Editor of .the EvEKiNa Stab.) I Sin,—Your'; correspoiidbni;/ " Dion Snip," appears full-of virtuous indignation that '/^.nother Tjpperary Boy-r" shoulH^aU AnliM^Mdmat mWfflel '{ under instruction." " Dion Snip" write?'under instruction, >oh no! "Dioit Snip^ requires! no•instruction^not 'h_s Bravo^ " Dion?? .'* it is a false and:<wicke& as&umption:«'Vfo suppose: you wrote in the Y'ixftib instance'? "under;instruction, c al/ ibough you admit .doing)so in ,the. ( second iostauceM ; Surely that admission, was a slipywais> ifc'not;":Snip?" ; Listen,'^Mp? perary" and all ye Star reader v (and v-ho does not) toithe iSraole, ''I wrot« the ioie:iioi«nlighten '\Tipper«y;' ; l knew ;hat thfe (theo^huydil) &os>{; i cnew tio faulti'&c.; I now tell 'Another lUp^ew^ysßby^.'&o;:; f -j wjQuldsiSqtxftgaitf j3eign,ft>fcc{ci I, fDion Snip*ywfi(ald^npjt condasoend ) to enlighten your ' lamentable ignorance.' " Kow,*-f4,Dion Snip," as you applßar.-^ io, r|" thej,sjacred.wi%tipgsjfp#! |hfiM^f(wlte| andfthe inspired writibgs::dfj MOI7 Writ," wifUjQu" .answer me this Question. Does4(itstmS(sditholic Church teach doctrines not to be found in either jthe writbgsyoWihSTSSip^ifleiabKin Holy jWrit P , Judging you by your own estiniatel you 1 are Well qualified >to,aniwertke jabove without any ni .saall