Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REPLY TO TIPPERARY.

! <To the Editor *of the Evening Star.) ; Sib, —A, person has just called ray attention to a [letter in Jy6ur issue of the sth inst., sigaed'ATipperary," evidentlywritten by some very obtuse individual as regards the rules of the Koman Catholic he says he.,^belongs. With'regard to "the « rumour " 'that the le» st-i£?^ not ?°' to he > burAal of McAulifle, I may say I underst;an^ it is perfectly true. ;The reasons he did npi; do'"sbJLundpfstlind are, that the deceased ]*[cAuliffe was, according tb the decrees of our Church, outside its pale, and cpnsiequentl^lnpt; entitled to. be buried as onfc of ita members. He did ripfc'■; practice {tjteHdman Catholic Beligibn during his ;lifetime, and consequently despised its ¥^ cbjnm^nds; and Chnsti sbji; ";|se': that will, hjot hear the": Church l^t him' ;]be to! thiefe ks the hea^th^n find the pubii.ca^l'! • THerefbre as the dhurph'did noOec££nise 'KcAuliffe r as one of : its me^b^rs, Jher priests could not attend his burial; in fact, the fourth Council^''of Ijjateran expressly prohibits themrto^attjndj a: funeral of any ypersbn rvrho:n^g.v I scted his known duties' as a Catholic. I telieve that one «f the ;irielatives of the deceased not only stated that he did not practice the-; Catholic religion^, ;but also tiat he wai de facto an iDfidel. So that if wil};bjß seen that it,,nas not;"jEhe"fault,pf the priest t]^|^c Auliffe did not receive J the last " ritej " off the, Church to. w^jch ,he professed i jtp, belong. The Churchi Vf ith^Kej; divine,, authority, :decrfied the course.-they; should take, -and that depree i^ jjaseaeupon^the : dQgmatio. testimony pf Christ himself. The presumption of 'I Tipperary "; in st^tinj? th^ the, conduct pf the priest in this instance ' is an itvnoViatjpn. in; thepractices x>f thejjlecgy; pfiny G.hurchr'Vis^really:imjusingi in,^sp/faras the writer is so monstrously ignorant.>pf the practices and precepts of his Churclii which ignorance he lucidly displays in his letter..f,- Lelsytoe •.; him, t|me Beis"sufferin*g from 'caecethessdfiberidi nbt to write on*any;tbing connected with the Eoman Catholic ""CKurch, as by doing so he will.only display his own ignorance and his own evil consciencel-^1 am, <fee,

Pion^S^tip.

Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THS18740507.2.13.1

Bibliographic details

Thames Star, Volume III, Issue 1667, 7 May 1874, Page 2

Word Count
341

REPLY TO TIPPERARY. Thames Star, Volume III, Issue 1667, 7 May 1874, Page 2

REPLY TO TIPPERARY. Thames Star, Volume III, Issue 1667, 7 May 1874, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert