Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WORLD COURT.

AMERICA’S ATTITUDE DEFINED. By Cable—Press Association—Copyright, ryitralian and N.Z. Cable Asi»oci**tl.-.. ’WASHINGTON, March 24. President (Joolidge sees no reason why the United States should further explain the terms upon which it agreed to enter the World Court. He believes the reservations adopted by tile Senate when it approved of the American Court membership, speak for themselves—that neither the League of Nations nor anyone else can fail to sec tlieir purpose and effect. Consequently he doubts whether any good purpose would be served by sending an American representative'to the meeting called by the League Council to discuss the scope of the American ratification of the Court.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19260326.2.47

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Timaru Herald, Volume CXXIII, 26 March 1926, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
107

WORLD COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume CXXIII, 26 March 1926, Page 9

WORLD COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume CXXIII, 26 March 1926, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert