Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUPREME COURT.

ALLEGED FRAUD

By Cable —Fri'*s Aesoniatinn —Oop)riglil WELLINGTON, May 13.

The retrial of George Nelson Shore, charged with theft of £3OO, the property of the Eastbourne Borough Council, and alternatively with conspiring with another to defraud the Council of the same amount, was continued in the Supreme Court before Mr Justice Ostler and a jury of twelve. The first hearing of the case was last week, when, after a jirial lasting two days, the jury disagreed. The allegations, which Shore denied, were that he secured bogus monthly tickets for the ferry steamers, and entered into a conspiracy with on 9 Doran, who has since pleaded guilty, to sell them. Doran was the chief witness for the Crown.

In cross-examination, Shore said that he commenced at £4 per week, but when ho left he was getting £6. Mr Macassey, dealing with the banking accounts, said payments into the same often exceeded the whole of Shore’s salary. ' Shore said the payments were mado partly from his salary, partly from petty transactions, and also their payment, by instalments, of £IOO, a loan he had made to a friend. On. December 23rd, when he paid in £94, he had won that money on a double. Pressed to' give the name of the bookmaker, accused and said he could not remember the names of the horses he had won the. money on. Asked how he paid in £421 during 1923, and £245 7s in 1924, accused did not explain. Mr Mazengarb, for accused, said the principal witness for the prosecution was a liar, and a convicted thief. The jury returned, after an absence of an hour and twenty minutes, with a verdict of guilty on the count ot stealing, but they were unable to specify the definite amount. On the second count, of conspiracy with Doran, the jury found prisoner guilty, but added that there was great laxity in the methods of checking tickets. Sentence was deferred until to-morrow.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/THD19250514.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 14 May 1925, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
326

SUPREME COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 14 May 1925, Page 5

SUPREME COURT. Timaru Herald, Volume XCVIII, 14 May 1925, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert