RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

Thames Advertiser, Volume VII, Issue 1856, 4 July 1874, Page 3

RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT.-Yesterday.

'■■■.' ■ ;,'.■ (Before TC.'FRISBR, Esq,, 8.M.,); • ;...; ,;"'JrMMENTS : FOR PiiINTfFFS.— WvH. Criok yi'Henry'' Winehcombe; 64)' for rates;.coats 10s';-' Murphy Bros. y/rJpHn;ip:duglag;:ulairnV£ supplied.'jCOst's .'243.;,' G. Dalziei ,t, Daniel Orme, claini,;Sl'J(. 12s : 4d, for Igoods supplied. —Defendant'said 'that he- was already paying one,creditor $1; per week. ■it would take 14 .weeks;^to,.pay. that, and f he would -'then i commence). to> .pay Mr Dalziei.—'His Worshipjsaidrkeicould not interfere.—Oosts'£l 9i; Robert Perries and.Morgan Davis/W'Vulcan G. M. 0., clairk l ''£?, < ;for' !i w6rk-'andlabour done, )osts':£2^*';.;''; ; ;•''•;.. : .".- : ' ! ' ' Adjourned Oa ; se.—P.'' A.'Gledhill v. ..Nathaniel Brand.—This was a claim for. £50 money had and received.—.Mr Brassy asked to have the case further adjourried,*and tlieadjournment was granted for a'fortnight. '''E.f .EioHikps, v. Chames OalooVT— This waV,a'claim;for i £so damages.—Mr Macd'oaald" appeared ] for _' tli"6 * plaintiff. Th'e action was for breach' of a'cohtract jßot. -up (for, sale, by the -.defendant to tho plaintiff of a share in telly's tribute.— Mr Macdonali said 'that in this case the action bid been brought on the speculation of the Statute:of Frauds not being set itp ; by or it it'were set up that'a-section- of the Mining Districts ■'Act 5 would.'/carry the plaintiff through. But the Statute of Frauds being relied on, arid,,as 'it' ior'tuuately 'for the general publicj appeared that the provisions of 1 that statute' affecting contracts relating to tribute agreements continued, the plaintiff would, ,■ as : the agreement suod oil was verbal,:take a nonsuit,—Plaintiff was nonsuited with costs £1 lis., ; ;./,-:, ';