AMALGAMATION OF CLAIMS.
To the EOitor of Tub Thames Gcaiuman. Silt, —In this morning’s issue of your paper, my signature to a letter referring to the proposed amalgamation of the Nonpareil and Waiteniata claims was given as “ John Ward ell.” I do not blame you for this, as I confess my writing is not too distinct. The heading, “The Latest Bubble,” was not mine : indeed so far from thinking that amalgamation is not desirable, I am most decidedly of opinion that if the two claims were one, each
would benefit, but the terms should be well considered. My intention in writing was to inform shareholders that I had nothing whatever to do with the initiation of the proposed amalgamation ; but I now purpose giving the matter some attention, and to this end early next week I will make section drawings of the two mines, and place the result before your readers. I am, &c,, John Goodall, C.E, Grahamstown, Oct. 21, 1871.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TGMR18711023.2.24.1
Bibliographic details
Thames Guardian and Mining Record, Volume I, Issue 14, 23 October 1871, Page 3
Word Count
161AMALGAMATION OF CLAIMS. Thames Guardian and Mining Record, Volume I, Issue 14, 23 October 1871, Page 3
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in