PROHIBITION.

Temuka Leader, Issue 2548, 29 August 1893, Page 3

PROHIBITION.

TO THE EDITOR. Sir, —While agreeing with “ Observer ” that the problem of poverty is one of the leading problems, at the same time I would condemn the solution he suggests, viz., a flourishing liquor trade. One is quite prepared to admit that there are many things at work that cause a very unequal distribution of wealth, yet one cannot deny that one of the most prolific sources is intemperance. Wherever there is a flourishing liquor trade, it enriches the few and beggars the many. Hence the true solution of this problem cannot be found in that which “ Observer ” has suggested. His suggestions would only drag the masses deeper in the mire. In reference to Prohibition the very opposite would occur to what “Observer” fears. Prohibition, instead of making things worse would help to solve this problem, and would decidedly bring about a better state of things. First, there would be a revival of trade, and while there might be a number thrown out of work through the closing of the breweries, &c., there would be a number required required for other industries. And if the same sum of money which is now spent in drink, were spent to provide more comfort for the home and the person, more labor would be required to produce such than would be required to produce liquor. Farmers, tradesmen, and the laboring classes would all be benefited by Prohibition. In reference to the revenue that local bodies derive from the liquor traffic, if Prohibition were enforced things would shortly right themselves. Not nearly the sum contributed by the local bodies towards charitable aid would then be required, for the majority of those who receive charitable would have been in different circumstances had it not been for intemperance. Thus what would be lost in one way would be gained in another. Again, if Prohibition were enforced there would certainly be a reduction in public expenditure, for crime and lunacy would decrease, and the staff now required to enforce law and order could then be considerably lessened. So, though the Government would lose a certain sum from revenue, on the other hand there would be less expense for them to face. That these and other benefits would accrue from Prohibition can be amply proved by the reliable testimony from those who reside where Prohibition has been tried. The liquor traffic can never help to solve the problem of poverty, but Prohibition can and will. Thanking you in anticipation.—l am, etc., W. O. Woodward.