Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

AN ENLIGHTENED JURY.

O'Oonriell, defending a prisoner at Cork related the following anecdote to the Jury:— " Seme years ago I went specially to Clonmell Assizes, and accidentally witnessed a trial which I shall never forget. ««A wretched man,- a native; of that County, was charged with the murder of his neighbour. It seemed that an ancient feud existed between them. They met at a fair, and exchanged blows; again that evening they met at a low pot-house, and the bodily interference of friends alone prevented a fight between them. "The prisoner was heard to vow vengeance against his rival. The ■wretched victim left the house, followed soon after by the prisoner, and was found next day on the roadBide, murdered, and his face so barbarously beaten in by a stone that he could only be identified by his dress. " The facts were strong against the priipber-—in fact, it was the strongest carfe-of circumstantial evidence 1 ever met with..' As a; form' (of his guilt there was no doubt), the prisoner was called for his defence. "He called—to the surprise of everyohe-^-the;murdered man. And the murdered man came forward. It geemed that another man had been murdered-f-.thijf the identification by dress wob vague, for all the peasantry of Tipperary wear the same description of clothes—that the pre»umed victim having got a hint that he would be arrested"under,the Whiteboy Act had fled, and only returned, with a noble and Irish feeling of justice, when he found that his ancient foe was in jeopardy on his account. The case was dear: the prisoner was innocent. " The Judge ; told the Jury that it wag unnecessary to charge them. They requested permission to retire; they returned 5 in about two hours, when the Foreman, with a long face, handed in the verdict,' Guilty.' " Everyone was astonished. '?'.' Good God!' said the Judge, 'of what 'is he guilty ? Not of murder, surely P.' '.'.' '"No, my lord,' said the Foreman* * but if he 5 did not murder that man> sure he Btole my grey mare three years ago.'"

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18890801.2.23

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Temuka Leader, Issue 1924, 1 August 1889, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
340

AN ENLIGHTENED JURY. Temuka Leader, Issue 1924, 1 August 1889, Page 4

AN ENLIGHTENED JURY. Temuka Leader, Issue 1924, 1 August 1889, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert