RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT
Totbxa —Monday, Oct. 1. (Before Captain 0. A. Wray, It.M.) CIVIL CASES. Gh McS. GUntlemun t. H. Simpson —Claim £2 15s 9d. The plaintiff »tated that he had received £2 of the amount due, and ■judgment was given for the balance, with costs. . J. Winning v. B. O'Neil—Claim £lßs6d. , 3 The plaintiff stated that £1 3s had been paid. The defendant called in and got a jar from witness, and said that he would return it in a few days or pay for it. He did not return it for two months, and witness declined to take it. The price usually charged for such jars was 8s 6d. Edward O'iNeil said he borrowed the jar, on condition that if he broke it he would pay for its. There was nothing more about paying for it. Mr Winning never aiked him for a return of it, but sent in his bill. He did not promiie to send it in a few days. His Worship said the defendant ought to have returned the jar sooner, but plaintiff ought to have reminded him of returning it, aa it would have been a small matter to send him a note demanding its return. He would give judgment for £1 3s, and order the jar to be returned. The Court then rose.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18881002.2.16
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 1797, 2 October 1888, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
220RESIDENT MAGISTRATE'S COURT Temuka Leader, Issue 1797, 2 October 1888, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in