RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA.
Mondat, June 6, 1881. (Before J. Nugent Wood, Esq., R.M., and S. D. Barker, Emj., J.P.) assault. Hutt v. T. Palmer. ' On this case being ailed oa defendant did not appear in answer to the charge. In reply to the Bench, Sergeant Morton stated that he saw accused who said he would not attend as he had instructed his solicitor to appear for him. Ultimately the accused appeared in Court, and stated he had retained Mr flamersley, and asked-for an adjournment as the l itter had not arrived from Timatn The case was adjourned for a week, CIVIL CASES. T. Trengrove v. F. N. Burne—Claim £52 6s Bdon a dishonored promissory note. Judgment for amount claimed with costs £ll7s. Immediate execution to follow non-payment, Hutt y Palmer—Claim £1 Is for wages due. The amount had been paid into Court, but the fees had not been tendered at the same time. Judgment for amount paid into Court with costs 7s. Defendant informed the Court that he declined to pay costs.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18810607.2.11
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 397, 7 June 1881, Page 3
Word count
Tapeke kupu
173RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA. Temuka Leader, Issue 397, 7 June 1881, Page 3
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in