RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA.
Monday, Dec. 20, 1880; ,R: y CIVil, CASES. Burrows v Dundas. —Claim £6 3s 9d. J udgment given to be paid within ten days, or in default to be imprisoned for 14 days. Weir v. O’Connor. Judgment summons, £2 4s 4cl. Ordered to be paid at once, failing which 14 days’ imprisonment. Wm. Phillips v Boultly.—Claim £2 12s Judgment for amount and costs W. Story v Frame—Claim £7 Judgment for amount claimed and costa Temuka Road Board v D. Hoare—Claim £2 11s 3d, for rates for the year 1880. Mr Bolton, rate collector, deposed to having duly posted the notice on the sth August asking payment of the amount. The letter was addressed to the Shamrock Hotel, The defendant did not object to the rate at the time nor since, nor has he applied to the Board to have another name substituted. He did not know to whom the land belonged, and the amount is still unpaid. The defendant said he had not owned or occupied the land for two years, and that the land belonged to Mr Perry. His Worship said defendant should have seen that bis name was taken off the roll. H® must now, however, give judgment against plaintiff. Plaintiff applied for a iion-sujt, which was granted.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18801221.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 331, 21 December 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
214RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA. Temuka Leader, Issue 331, 21 December 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.