RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA.
Monday, a Oec. 11, 1880
(Before Wood, Esq., R.M. and S. D.,JBarker, Esq., J.P.) , , ; .ASSAULT Joseph Ma)nn n appeared to answer a complaint ma le by'JohnMclunes for the above offence. The prosecutor not appearing the case was struck out’. 1 ■ N civil ca'sSS^. B. Thomson v T. Kett—claim, £SB 4s, judgment sumnifedsl * : Mr Austin appeared for the judgment creditor. The defendant who did nob appear, was orda're to pay the amount forthwith, -.in--default three months’ imprisonment,..
- Gumming and Hayes v R. Sharp—claim, £7 11s for medical attendance. Mr Austin foy plaintiffs. The defendant disputed £l. It appeared that the defendant gave plaintiffs a cheque on account for £l tlie-drawcr-of which two days after became bankrupt,.,and the cheque riot being presented iriyiiiae was not honored. His' Worship gave judgment for £6 11s, hold, ing that the plaintiffs ought to have presented the cheque before. A, Mcßratney v J. Crow- claim, £2 for service of a mare. Mr-'Hamersley for< plaintiff, and ’ Mr Austib for defendant. Judgment was given for plaintiff for the amount claimed, i
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18801216.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 329, 16 December 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
177RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA. Temuka Leader, Issue 329, 16 December 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in