RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA.
Monday, Nov 29, 1880
(Before Nugent Wood, Esq. r R.M.) civil cases; Q'uinn v. Mosely.—Judgment summons. No appearance of defendant. This case had been adjourned from a previous sitting to enable plaintiff to ascertain defendposition. His Worship ordered .the amount to be paid forthwith, or one month’s imprisonment, remarking’, that the defendant seemed to 1 make an habitual practice of incurring debts and shirking the consequences. Gumming and Hayes ir. Ronrke,— Claim 12s 6d. Judgment by default. B. Thomson! v, Hamilton,—Claim £8 10s 7d. Judgment by default for amouait and costs. S Burrows v. W. W. Dundaa.—Claim £4. Judgment by default for amount and costs v Conway v. F. Innes. —Claim £l2.' 15s Judgment by default for amount and costa Nicholas v Thoreau—Claim 10s Judgment for plaintiff for amount and. costs. Tue Court then adjourned.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18801130.2.5
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 323, 30 November 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
139RESIDENT MAGISTRATE’S COURT, TEMUKA. Temuka Leader, Issue 323, 30 November 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in