R.M. COURT, TEMUKA.

Temuka Leader, Issue 269, 1 July 1880, Page 2

R.M. COURT, TEMUKA.

Wednesday, June 30th,

Before F. Guinness. Esq, R.M CIVIL OASES

Bradley v Cliff—Arguments were heard from Mr Johnston as to the legality of placing the defendant in the box to prove tlie plaintiff’s case, but the learned counsel failed to alter the Bench’s opinion as expressed last Court day, Annie Brosnahan v Inncs—Claim Ll 4 Ml’ Austin for plaintiff

This was a claim for the maintenance of the children of the late Michael Barrett, as per agreement (produced) Judgment was given for amount claimed and costs.

Northam v Anderson—Claim Ll 5 Judg raont by default for ainom t claimed and costs.

Camming and Hayes v Martin—Claim L2l 3s Gd, for professional attendance Judgment by default for amount claimed and costs.

Camming and Hayes v Hopkins Claim Li 12s Judgment for amount claimed and costs

Henry and Findlay v Moore Claim Ll 3 14s 6d Judgment for amount claimed and COS (3

Mason v Holloway Claim L 3 10s In thii case p'aintiff received a cheque from the' defendant, drawn by a third party, and Mi* Hamersley argued that the ch-que \ra, 4 ) sold to plaintiff for goods, and the proper course to Lave pursued was for the plaintiff to have tendered hack the cheque after dishonor. and sued defendant for goods uold and delivered.

Mr Austin having replied, and quoted autlioriti !S, asked* for judgment for tlie plaintiff

The Bench decided the case in favor of defendant with costs.

White v Brown C’aim LSO It appeared that previous to M. Dunu becoming a bankrupt he gave Mr White a b’dl of sale for LSO On Dunn becoming bankrupt Mr White enforced the bill of sale,and defendant being appointed trustee, 'ejected the plaintiffs bailiff on behalf of Dunn’s creditors, and sold the articles enumerated in the bill.

ffker hearing the evidence of plaintiffs bailiff, Mr Austin called J. Brown, M. Dunn, T Davis, and J Mendeison for the defence The Court then adjourned till today, ■when the case will be continued