R.M. COURT, TEMUKA.

Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2

R.M. COURT, TEMUKA.

Kkfoue F. Glhxnkss, .Esq., U.M. WKiiXHsn.w-j 3uu Mir., 1880. , Tip Court sat at 10 a in. clru k- \vnrc fyied 'aeh. The case against' Oaw.bcT. -for shooting was V,;*.ivnght on again yesterday. 51-r ;t Carly on • prw>Viited, Mr Air! in defended. j if'cr hearing conducing evidence on both > speh (ho Bemdi commuted Holier for trial , at Tin. June silting of the Tinmen Supreme j Cmip-t, bail.t,ping as before. I v innes.— : 'l'l;is was ip assault ca--e. Fenton" swore ! li;i ( limes assaulted Itim in the'l CaV.oviiipi Hotel on Tuesday. limes ordered j Fenton out, and he refused limes took him i bv Hie eo'lar ijeid put him out of the bar. j ‘ Py defendant --'hd 1 ncjt tdf yqjj Hjijl: yap. I were drunk and not fit for yipr dniiU e' To Mr Austin—;l wtis not t'inimk. Air limes, of Christchurch, said he was proprietor of the Caledonian Hotel. Fenton was drunk on Monday night and Tuesday morn- j imr. Asked him* to leave ; he did so, asking ( if he was to leave the house: J old him he , might stav and have what food bo wanted. J Air Austin 1 submit, your Worship, that ; th • case is made out, The Magistrate said the case was proved ; He said that as Fenton held the lieense Hie defendant had no right to hit e-fere. He cautioned defendant, and lined him 10s and 2Ss fid. Mr. Austin preferred a case against Air limes for sdling liquor without a license Mr limes applied for an adjournment till his solicitor could appear CIVIL CISI'S. Pilbrow v Bren ban -Bulan eof account for drilling land Brosnahan pleaded that ho had an agreement Pplbypyr denned it, and said 2s fid an acre charge for all drilling under 50 acres lirosnahan said be agreed for Is 9d an ye; re J Bi own stated that Pilbrow charged liim the rate of 2s per acre for iyl acres Judgment for amount and cf.sts Job Brown v J llardino- —Claim IAO los tSd No appearance of defendant Judgment for amount and costs Aitken v Hobson, adjourned from last Court dav. The pig intiff, a widow residing in Npscty', .that defendant paid her Ujg. |«r the balance, lilefeudpnt swore that he. piud plaintiff’s husband' bpt this was denied, and said her husband gild hprsfi\f hat sight of defendant till they saw hup Vime day in Christehurch ; they spoke to him, and he promised to send the*money ; he sent he- the sum named ; the plaintiff showed ft at the sum was due, Th Bench gave judgment for plaintiff with cos's.

LICENCING- COURT. Present"P. Guinness, Esq, E.M., and

Messrs (xanmek and ti. D. Parker.

.An applicafim was made to renew .the license granted originally to Mr Partlcy, and ,t xnsferred from him to Mr Teuton. Irom "fcicrgt Carlyou’s evident, it was proved that; t’lo house was not properly conducted. On. one occasion it was sunt up ; on anql icr the house was closed agamst the lodgers, and ton- ftpn would not allow them to retunp Sergeant tire p.ei^s,ops, ij3 r t|i,e hpusedid not ..eQpdju.ct; tiieip f s.el.v.es t and po respect: go,iiitopit ; Mr : lppQ«."seated'he was owner of th.e house j .a-nu y t as his.freeJtoljd,property. Jje sent Ij.on-i io,n dow.iutp take ,c iirge of ; it,, and’ afterwards sent a Mr.Beattie d.o.wp 'irpip .C/iristchurch,? when he found Fenton was .pi.pt the house right, Jieatlie. N y;as ..under Fenton, h d to see that all things .ivor.c conducted properly JFroiptlie ,e t idexi.ee jit appeared the Beach had be-ir led to belupre the’ homo was Fenton's property, but this was not the ease, as Mr Tunes had but the house in charge of one man after another, who condoc'ed it in a way that made t a disgrace to the place Tiie Ben di here retired, and on their return said that as the house was conducted very disorderly, as proved by p dice, the Bench felt it tlicir duty to withhold tin license and shut the house