Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A CASE FOR INQUIRY.

A cun .-us narrative lias reached ns during’ the lasl few (lavs (says the V.K‘l ington Post). Aixn.it six, months , ago iv nv.4l known Molivi: rol Wellington receiver. u mile from an inmate .of the M unt View Asylum, asking him to oonm and s (' him, us he was confin'd tiiero be tirely without cause, Die solicitor at once applied to the Government tor the access rv order, yvlucn he obtained. An interview with t e patient convinced uiin that the case demandef investigate >n. He next obtained permi sion lor Hr. Diver to e amino the supposed lunatic. Lhe result of this examination was that the , patient—wh >, we may explain, was p we to-do : Tarmer, residing in on*.-, or the Wellington country district —was pronounced perfectly sane, and immediately released.: About a month a o the released Mr A cany to town, and informed the same solicitor that m* wiie had given him into custody p dav or two before for using threatening language to her. He was imprisoned for one night, and in the morning no one appeared against him. Ho wap ’informed, however, hy a friend, that another warr-nt for lunacy was out against him,“and he sought the solicit ws al\i• • as to what he shoull do, I TDiver, being satisfied that the case was perfect iV rational, agam interested himself in the case. This lime lie took Mr A to Dr Johnston, and an hour’s complete examiii’a'ion .resulted in both lloctors agreeing,that the man was in fu’l possession of his reason m every Sf*nc(! of tile wnnl. Mr A— subseiiuen'ly accompanied the solicitor to ins office ami made a fresh will, a former one having been drawn up umese■ < y in his wif ’s favour, Since this occurred wo believe the persecuted one has not been molested. 'lhere are twp points about the storv, as rebated to us which, if .-o’Tect, demand inquiry. One L is the statement that Mr A , wtiry , in the Asylum, was not allowed munieate with his friends, » a some months-’ confinement,-fU y eeeded in getting a letter pent to solicitor on promising to pay, nn . ing, a bribe of Do ; the other man’s assertion that one of the ■ who signed the. certificate-for initial » personal enemy, altercation

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18800304.2.12

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2

Word count
Tapeke kupu
379

A CASE FOR INQUIRY. Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2

A CASE FOR INQUIRY. Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert