A CASE FOR INQUIRY.
A cun .-us narrative lias reached ns during’ the lasl few (lavs (says the V.K‘l ington Post). Aixn.it six, months , ago iv nv.4l known Molivi: rol Wellington receiver. u mile from an inmate .of the M unt View Asylum, asking him to oonm and s (' him, us he was confin'd tiiero be tirely without cause, Die solicitor at once applied to the Government tor the access rv order, yvlucn he obtained. An interview with t e patient convinced uiin that the case demandef investigate >n. He next obtained permi sion lor Hr. Diver to e amino the supposed lunatic. Lhe result of this examination was that the , patient—wh >, we may explain, was p we to-do : Tarmer, residing in on*.-, or the Wellington country district —was pronounced perfectly sane, and immediately released.: About a month a o the released Mr A cany to town, and informed the same solicitor that m* wiie had given him into custody p dav or two before for using threatening language to her. He was imprisoned for one night, and in the morning no one appeared against him. Ho wap ’informed, however, hy a friend, that another warr-nt for lunacy was out against him,“and he sought the solicit ws al\i• • as to what he shoull do, I TDiver, being satisfied that the case was perfect iV rational, agam interested himself in the case. This lime lie took Mr A to Dr Johnston, and an hour’s complete examiii’a'ion .resulted in both lloctors agreeing,that the man was in fu’l possession of his reason m every Sf*nc(! of tile wnnl. Mr A— subseiiuen'ly accompanied the solicitor to ins office ami made a fresh will, a former one having been drawn up umese■ < y in his wif ’s favour, Since this occurred wo believe the persecuted one has not been molested. 'lhere are twp points about the storv, as rebated to us which, if .-o’Tect, demand inquiry. One L is the statement that Mr A , wtiry , in the Asylum, was not allowed munieate with his friends, » a some months-’ confinement,-fU y eeeded in getting a letter pent to solicitor on promising to pay, nn . ing, a bribe of Do ; the other man’s assertion that one of the ■ who signed the. certificate-for initial » personal enemy, altercation
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TEML18800304.2.12
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
379A CASE FOR INQUIRY. Temuka Leader, Issue 239, 4 March 1880, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.