Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

WHAT'S THE IDEA?

DROPPING KING’C BIRTHDAY. In the industrial dispute of the tanning and fellmongers trade before the Conciliation Council at O hristchurch, the union asked for May 1 as a holiday on full pay. The union agent, Mr. Ellis, explained that this was a day celebrated as Labour Day all over the world. Mr. G. Bowron (an employer): But you’ve got Labour Day for New Zealand. Do ybh want two Labour Days? And what is the idea of cutting out the King’s Birthday. It looks to me you want to strike out the King’s Birthday and put in May Day instead. That’s my judgment. Mr. Ellie: But your judgment is not always right. An employer: How many unions in New Zealand celebrate May it The Conciliation Commissioner! Mr. Hagger): I don’t know of one. Mr. Bowron: Well, we strongly object to it. Mr. Ellie (to Mr. Bowron): You Mr. Ellis (to Mir. Bowron): You think you can see something? Mr. Bowron (interrupting): Pretty reddish.

Mr. Ellie: Yes, I know you think we are red, but that’s wrong. Mr. Bowron: Well, I want to know what actuated you people in dropping the Kling’s Birthday and substituting May Day. Mr. Ellie explained that the King’s birthday was by no means universally recognised in New Zealand industry. The King’s birthday was like Anniversary Day; some people observed it, and some didn’t. There was really nothing objectionable about the May Day proposal. It was quite separate from New Zealand Labour Day anniversary. That was instituted to celebrate the gaining of the eight-hour day. There was nothing objectionable about Socialism or Socialists. “If Socialists are objectionable,” remarked My. Ellie, "than I am one of the objectionable people.” Ultimately the union assessors agreed to drop the demand in regard to May Day, but it fell to Mr. Ellis to have the last word. “I’ve got the impression,” he said, “that you believe that at the backs of our minds is the idea of disloyalty. You’re absolutely wrong; there’s nothing in it, nothing whatever.”

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19221209.2.50

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 9 December 1922, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

WHAT'S THE IDEA? Taranaki Daily News, 9 December 1922, Page 6

WHAT'S THE IDEA? Taranaki Daily News, 9 December 1922, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert