Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BISHOP LISTON’S SPEECH.

DRASTIC ACTION. TAKEN BY AUCKLAND CITY COUNCIL. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Auckland, Last Night. The City Council to-night passed a resolution as follows: “That the council solemnly and sincerely affirming its loyalty and allegiance to King George and to the British Empire, deplores the disloyal and seditious speech, delivered by Dr. Liston,. Roman Catholic coadjutor Bishop of Auckland, in the Town Hall, and resolves: (I) That the council hereby records its condemnation of the said lecture, and declares the opinion that no person capable of making statements reported to have been made by Dr. Liston is of British citizenship; (2) that the speech be brought under the notice of the New Zealand Government with a view to its taking appropriate' action; (3) that those concerned in the hire of the Town Hall and Auckland Domain in connection with St. Patrick’s day celebrations be notified that until the sentiments expressed in the speech and evident in the proceedings are disavowed, and an. assurance given against any repetition of such statements, neither of these facilities will be available for organisations under those auspices, and on whose behalf the Bishop claimed .he spoke, that the city solicitor be instructed to redraft the terms for the hire of the Town Hall and the by-laws governing the use of the Domain, redraft the by-laws relating to parks and open spaces, and consider* the council’s powers regarding licensing public halls, so as to require all proceedings to be conducted in a lawful and constitutional manner, without disloyalty, sedition or other conduct invidious to the realm or constituting an affront to the citizens.”

A SOLITARY DISSENTIENT. Later. The council's resolution re Bishop Liston was opposed by Mr. Bloodworth, who moved four amendments, all failing to find a seconders Mr. Bloodworth said the Mayor was right in writing to Bishop Liston, but should have awaited a reply before publishing a statement. The motion went further than the council should go. He considered that stronger speeches would have gone unnoticed in Britain, and pleaded for freedom of speech here. The St. Benedict’s branch of the Hibernian Australasian Catholic Benefit Society passed a unanimous resolution which deprecated the attacks on Bishop Liston, condemned the unwarranted attitude adopted toward, the Bishop by so-called Catholics, and recording unswerving fidelity to and appreciation of Bishop Liston.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220324.2.55

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
385

BISHOP LISTON’S SPEECH. Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

BISHOP LISTON’S SPEECH. Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert