Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

OCCUPIED TERRITORY.

AMERICA’S CLAIM, FOR COST OF ARMY. STRONG NOTE TO ALLIES. By Telegraph—Press Assn.—Copyright. Received March 23, 9.5 p.m. IjVashington, March 22. It is understood that America’s note to Britain, France, Italy, Belgium and Japan states that the recognition and granting of the United States’ claim for the cost of occupying the Rhine territory is doubly binding on the Allies, since it was at the urgent solicitation of the Allies that American troops were kept in Germany; also there was a solemn agreement between the Allies and Associated Powers that payment of the cost of the armies of occupation should constitute a first lien on ’German assets, which understanding always contemplated the payment of American costs. The note adds: “Since Germany has not objected, there seems to be no basis for Allied objections.”

TERMS OF THE NOTE. A STRONG ARGUMENT. Received March 23, 9.30 p.m. Washington, March 22. The State Department, in a note to the Allies, pointe out that, they cannot raise a technical objection to the United States receiving a share of the cost of occupation of German territory, on the ground that she is not a signatory to the Versailles Treaty, in view of the fact that Germany explicitly consented to priority being given to American costs, notwithstanding that she had not ratified the Versailles Treaty. The note also points out that the United States will welcome the Allies’ suggestions for a reasonable adjustment of the matter, but, pending such considerations, the United States hopes the Allies will refrain from the distribution of the funds to the exclusion of the United States.

NEW ARMISTICE PROPOSAL. FOR EXERCISING CONTROL. Received March 23, 7.50 pan. Paris, March 23. Lord Curzon submitted an armistice proposal which was agreed to unanimously. It provides that an Allied commission, acting under Allied direction, be attached to each army, and empowered to control the execution of the armistice conditions, and to intervene with the occupying authorities to protect the people and property in the occupied territory. A belligerent not desiring to renew the armistice must notify the other and Allied representatives fifteen days before the armistice terminates.

GERMAN LAW-BREAKER SHOT. Received March 23, 7.50 p.m. Brussels, March 22. Belgian soldiers shot a German officer, in the occupied territory, who was bearing arms contrary to orders. They pointed out the fact, and the German knocked a Belgian down. Another Belgian came to his comrade’s assistance and shot the German with a revolver.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220324.2.42

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
408

OCCUPIED TERRITORY. Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

OCCUPIED TERRITORY. Taranaki Daily News, 24 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert