Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARBITRATION COURT.

VARIATION OF AWARDS. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, March 22. The Arbitration Court to-day replied to a series of questions put to it by the Wellington Trades Council regarding its powers to vary awards and concerning the interpretation of the 1922 Act. The court said that, in regard to the adjustment of wages on the basis of the increased cost of living, it would hear one general case in Wellington to cover all the awards and industrial agreements throughout the Dominion. It was thought that three or four representatives of each side would be sufficient. The practice that had obtained in the past in connection with applications under the War Legislation Act, 1918, would be followed. The court would endeavor to make an announcement with regard to the movement of the cost of living about the end of the month and on April 26. would hear evidence and argument respecting economic and financial conditions affecting trade ami industry and all other relevant considerations. All clear cases would be excluded from the operation of the general order. In the case of applications by employers for the exclusion of any class or section of workers from the operation of the general order, on the ground '’’at a greater reduction should be made, it will be necessary to prove the existence of exceptional economic conditions. The court would have to be satisfied that the rate of remuneration would enable the workers to maintain a fair standard of living. The new legislation provided that the court should ascertain a “fair standard of living,” as against a “fair living wage” under the legislation now about to expire. The conception of what constituted a fair standard of living might vary from time to time, but it was thought that the altered wording was intended to enable the court to maintain as far as possible its relative standards. Rates fixed by any award or made after the coming into operation of the general order would not be affected by that order.

The judge left it to the Wellington Trades Council to arrange the Labor representation at the hearing on the general question.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220323.2.52

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 23 March 1922, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
356

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, 23 March 1922, Page 5

ARBITRATION COURT. Taranaki Daily News, 23 March 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert