Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ARBUCKLE CASE.

JURY DISAGREES. Br Telegraph.—Press Assn.—Copyright. San Francisco, Feb. 3. The jury in the Arbuckle trial disagreed and were discharged. Ten were for conviction and two against.— Reuter. THIRD TRIAL LIKELY. Received Feb. 5, 5.5 pan. San Francisco, Feb. 3. Following the discharge of the Arbuckle jury, which announced a disagreement after forty hours’ deliberation, the Court adjourned till Monday. The district attorney stated informally that in view of the majority of jurors favoring a conviction he would likely press for a third trial. —Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19220206.2.30

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 6 February 1922, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
89

THE ARBUCKLE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 6 February 1922, Page 5

THE ARBUCKLE CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 6 February 1922, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert