A TOILET PARLOUR.
REMOVING A MAN'S BEARD. CASE IN SUPREME COURT By telegraph—Press Assdolaflon. Auckland, Last Niffiit. At the Supreme Court.. Matilda Platt, a widow, sued Annie Violet Burrows Tor £2OO, alleging misrepresentation in a negotiation whereby she Was induced to .become a partner in defendant’s business .of toilet specialist. Defendant., she alleged, assorted she was taking £3O to £35 a 1 week from the business, afi'd Avitlf plaintiff’s a’MSistahce the fallings Would difiount td About £75 weekly. Deffefidafit Claimed to remove Warts and Molds, cure ’Sore eyes, and. remove Whiskefs.. Shfe gbt 35 guineas fbf rerildving a ‘iftAh’s Ugffrd. "but The man said he was not satiffftfed. Eventually plaintiff did hot receive the three guineas’ which she Was accustomed to draw. Defendant Assured her it would "be all right. The defendant denied the Allegatiofio. The Judge said lie could hot find that there fiatl "beeh Traitdulent misrepresentation, *but lie hiade ah orflef for the. taking of accounts.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19211210.2.32
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 10 December 1921, Page 4
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158A TOILET PARLOUR. Taranaki Daily News, 10 December 1921, Page 4
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in