Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE AUCKLAND SYNOD AND CHRISTIAN SCIENCE.

(To the Editor.) Sir, —In your issue of the 22nd instant, under the heading “Healing by Faith,’’ it is stated that Bishop Averill urged the clergy to study carefully the Lambeth Conference report on Christian Science in particular. One of the 300 Bishops present at that conference gave it as his opinion, as stated in the Overseas Daily Mail, that the report was superficial, and based on insufficient knowledge of Christian Science, and he suggested an earnest. practical study of the subject. The secretary of the committee set up to enquire into Christian Science and other teachings (the Bishop of Barron-in-Furness), invited a prominent Christian Scientist of London to appear before them, as they were “very anxious to state quite correctly the claims of Christian Science, and the foundations on which the claims rest.” The invitation was accepted, and after the report was made public, this gentleman wrote: “Lambeth, 1920, has failed miserably to understand the simplest claims of Christian Science. The Bishop has Neither correctly stated the claims of Christian Science, nor has he understood in the least the foundations on which Its claims reSt.” In view of these opinions from both sides it is easy to see that no true conclusion can be arrived at from a report based on the misconception of the Bishops. Anyone who wishes to know what Christian Science really teaches can do 'so by a first-hand study of its text book (“Science and Health,” with key to the Scriptures, by Mary Baker Eddy), and if he proves that he understands what be reads by overcoming sin and disease, he will be in a position to judge righteous judgment. He will also find that the errors of Christian Science itemised in the report do not exist outside of a misunderstanding of the teaching; that they are the result of an attempt ’to discern spiritual and eternal truth from a (material and temporal viewpoint.—l am, etc., MADGE BELL. Christian Science Committee on Publication. Auckland, October 26, 1921.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19211029.2.65.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 29 October 1921, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

THE AUCKLAND SYNOD AND CHRISTIAN SCIENCE. Taranaki Daily News, 29 October 1921, Page 8

THE AUCKLAND SYNOD AND CHRISTIAN SCIENCE. Taranaki Daily News, 29 October 1921, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert