Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE ETHICS OF LIFE INSURANCE.

THE SMALLFIELD CASE. When a man not excessively wealthy insures himself for £15,000 for no par ticular reason, and undertakes to pay the considerable sum of £416 a year in premiums, insurance companies are justified in taking precautions, says the Dominion in an editorial comment. The proceedings in the Smallfield case suggest that the proper time for caution is before accepting proposals for such large' amounts, and not after the insured person is dead. The financial circumstances of the late Mr. Smallfield at the time of his death were apparently regarded, in view of the heavy life insurance, as suggesting a possible motive for suicide, and it seems to have been mainly on this ground that the order was made by the Attorney-General for the first exhumation of the body. At the same time the evidence made it plain that if the death was not due to heart seizure while bathing—the Coroner’s finding at both inquests—it would only have been a suicide long premeditated, planned with the utmost ingenuity, and executed with an unflinching determination that was almost incredible. At the second inquest counsel challenged kts legality until the first was squashed,

Ad also expressed the opinion that the exhumation of the body was illegal. The Coroner admitted doubts as to his pow-

ers in the. matter. The body of this unfortunate man has twice been taken from its grave, a deliberate intention to defraud has been imputed to him, and after Wliat has been mainly an

exploring investigation the whole affair ends as it began. Opinions will differ as to how fi.r the insuran.ee companies and the Government were justified in acting on mere suspicion. Most people will incline to the view that such proceedings as at Hamilton should not have been begun unless the evidence in hand was so overwhelming as to make the result a foregone conclusion, zl feature of the case—which may, however, have been due to the zeal only of an agent—was that just before his death Mr. Smallfield was being canvassed to take up another policy for £5OOO.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19210716.2.83

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 16 July 1921, Page 9

Word count
Tapeke kupu
349

THE ETHICS OF LIFE INSURANCE. Taranaki Daily News, 16 July 1921, Page 9

THE ETHICS OF LIFE INSURANCE. Taranaki Daily News, 16 July 1921, Page 9

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert