Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PACIFIC TREATY.

RENEWAL UNNECESSARY. AGREEMENT STILL BINDING. UNLESS IT IS REVOKED. By Telegraph.—Press Assn.—Copyright. London, July 1. The Lord Chancellor's statement that the Anglo-Japanese Treaty, unless denounced, continues automatically comes as a bombshell. The Foreign Office has been criticised for having permitted the conference to remain in ignorance. Speeches on the subject were made in the belief that the renewal was a matter of urgency, not brooking delay. Had the Dominions been frankly informed before the departure of the Prime Ministers there would have been saved a vast amount of public, political and press misunderstanding, speculation and heartburning all over the world. The tardy recognition of the true position modifies the whole character of the conference. The fact that the treaty does not need renewal and cannot immediately be annulled removes the Premiers’ most anxious preoccupations. In a year’s time the whole matter may be viewed from a totally different standpoint. Important questions remain for the conference, but the Chancellor’s discovery alters the whole angle of the Dominions’ attitude towards the largest international problem. JAPANESE VIEWS. ON TRUSTING AMERICA. London, July 3. The Australian Press learns that Japanese circles are much gratified at the attitude of Australia and New Zealand over the renewal of the treaty. Many leading Japanese regard the possibility of an entente between Britain. America and Japan as the best possible solution of the situation. There are some Japanese, however, who argue: How are we going to trust America; she signed the Versailles treaty, bpt ignored it and made, her own peace with the Central Powers. We would want some guarantee that the changing administrations would ‘respect their predecessors’ signature. AMERICA AND JAPAN. JAPAN WANTS FRIENDSHIP. Received July 4, 5.5 p.m. Washington. July 3. M. Shidehar (Japanese Ambassador), in a statement, declared that the AngloJapanese alliance was never intended to be an instrument of hostility or defence aghinst the United States and the Senate’s failure to approve the AngloAmerican arbitration treaty did not affect this. Japan was naturally anxious to strengthen the ties of friendship and loyal co-operation with the British Empire. There was also a fixed determination that nothing would hamper Japan’s traditional goodwill towards the United Stales; both affiliations were somplimentary and essential. Japan fully realises that any venture at aggression in China would be hopeless of attainment- and destructive to Japan’s security. Japan desires to cultivate relations with China of mutual helpfulness and the alliance never exerted influence in other directions. —Aus.-N.Z. Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19210705.2.27

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 5 July 1921, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
410

PACIFIC TREATY. Taranaki Daily News, 5 July 1921, Page 5

PACIFIC TREATY. Taranaki Daily News, 5 July 1921, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert