Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

EXPULSION MOTION

CASE OF am. MAHON. By Telegraph.—Press Assn. —Copyrisht. Melbourne, Nov. 11. In the House of Representatives Mr. Hughes moved a motion for the expulsion of Mr. Mahon in view of his disloyal utterances. Mr. Mahon was not present, but wrote to Mr. Hughes regretting Ms absence and stating that He was unaware that the oath of an Australian Parliamentarian tied him in allegiance to Mr. Lloyd George. He submitted that the terms "illegal" and "disloyal" were not applicable to his speech. At the conclusion of Mr. Hughes' speech, Mr. Tudor moved an amendment: "That the House, while opposed to sedition and disloyalty, is of opinion that the allegations against Mr. Mahon should not be dealt with by the House, as they do not concern his conduct in Parliament, and the .judiciary has ample power to bring any person to trial for sedition and every person eo charged is entitled to 3 public trial by a jury of his peers." Melbourne, Nov. 12. In the House! of Representatives, Mr. Hughes, in a speech, declared that Mr. Mahon was doing his utmost to fan the flame between England and Ireland and to help in the disintegration of the Empire. He covered the honoured name of the Empire with the foullest slander and cruelly insulted humanity and'the overwhelming bulk of his fellow citizens. Mr. Mahon's attack was made deliberately. It was part of a world-wide conspiracy that had.become apparent since the war. A heated debate followed, the Labor Party charging Mr. Hughes with attempting to stir up sectarianism.

The Government proposes to force a division before adjourning. The Mahon expulsion motion was adopted by 31 votes to 17. It was strictly a party division.—Ails.-N.Z. Cable Assn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19201113.2.63

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 13 November 1920, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
285

EXPULSION MOTION Taranaki Daily News, 13 November 1920, Page 8

EXPULSION MOTION Taranaki Daily News, 13 November 1920, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert