Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

RACEHORSE DEAL.

ALLEGATIONS OF PERJURY. ECHO. W CIVIL ACTION. By Telegraph.—Press Association Palmerston N., Last Night. F S. Easton, racehorse owner, Foxton, appeared before Mr. Wyvevn Wilson, S.M., to-day on four charges of alleged perjurv. The prosecution was directed by Mr. .7. L. Stout, S.M., as a result of the hearing of a civil case, Eaiton v. Wright, heard at Foxton tccer tly. liaston claimed £2OO on a dishonored chtque given in purchase of the horse Stevens by Wright in lflll. Wright claimed that Easton agreed to take the hoise back. As witness had been disqualified Easton had said he had not presented the cheque, and the horse was accordingly sent back. Trask, a horse trainer said Stevens had been subsequmtly leased to him, he to receive either 15 or 20 per cent of the winnings. Thii lease had been drawn up in Easton's office on Easton's estate and signed by them both, and subsequently posted to the secretary of the Racing Conference for registration. Stevens had been raced in his name, and when the horse had broken down Easton Had given him to witness.

The secretary of the Racing Conference said he had 3een the registration of the lease of Stevens from Easton to Tre.sk. The lease had been burnt, and witness could not swear to the signature.

The Clerk of the Court at Forton said Barton denied at the hearing of the civil case that he had leased Stevens to Trask, that he had subsequently given him to Trask when he had broken down, or that the horse had ever been back on his place after he had been sold to Wright. Easton had explained the fact that he had not presented the cheque until July, 1920. 9 years after it had been given to him, by the fact that he had known Wright was short of funds. When he heard of Wright's winnings at the Wellington winter meeting he had presented the cheque, and it had been dishonored

Mr. T. M. Wilford, for the accused, reserved his defence, and the accused pleaded not guilty, and was committed to the Supreme Court for trial. Bail wai allowed in £IOO on his own recognisances.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19201028.2.40

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 28 October 1920, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
365

RACEHORSE DEAL. Taranaki Daily News, 28 October 1920, Page 5

RACEHORSE DEAL. Taranaki Daily News, 28 October 1920, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert