Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE.

The remarks recently made by Mr. Justice Stringer at Hamilton', relative to the wide meaning attached to the crime of manslaughter, direct attention to the reason why in so many casea before the Supreme Court a failure of justice takes place. It is remarkable that, in view of the difficulty experienced in obtaining convictions on a charge of manslaughter, the necessary amendment of the criminal code lias not been made long since, but there exists a strong disinclination to depart from the beaten track of criminal law and to adjust the hoary usages of the past to the exigencies of the present. Justice Stringer was perfectly right when he said that in the minds of the people the charge of manslaughter is generally regarded as a mitigated form of murder. The latter may be defined as the act of killing a human being with premeditated malice—not necessarily causing instant death, but resulting in the victim dying within a year and a day. The' United States law recognises degrees in murder, while in France, and some other civilised countries, extenuating circumstances are taken into.consideration, and occasionally what is termed the "unwritten law" is regarded as justification. Manslaughter (or homicide) is the killing of one man by another, and, in law, is of three kindsjustifiable, excusable and felonious. So far as the remarks of Mr. Justice Stringer apply it is only necessary to consider excusable manslaughter, when it happens from misadventure. He considers that in cases of death caused by the neglect of another person, called "criminal neglect," juries would not have the same reluctance to convict if they understood clearly the difference in the wide range of offences termed manslaughter, and he put forward a suggestion that the law should be altered so as to designate certain cases of manslaughter as "criminal negligence." In Scots law, manslaughter is defined as "culpable homicide," and it would seem that such r a term might well be applied to such cases as those where death is caused by persons driving motors without a full sense of responsibility and thereby causing loss of life. Now that attention has been calledto this defect in the present criminal code by a Judge of the Supreme Court, it should be followed by legislative action. The perils of the highways due to criminal carelessness will only be alleviated by the due punishment of all offenders.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19200903.2.25

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 3 September 1920, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
398

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. Taranaki Daily News, 3 September 1920, Page 4

CRIMINAL NEGLIGENCE. Taranaki Daily News, 3 September 1920, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert