Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

CLAIM FOR COMMISSION.

SALE OF A URENUI FARM. At the Magistrate's Court at Hawera, yesterday, before Mr. T. A. B. Bailey, S.M„ Peter F. Donnelly (Mr. F. C. Spratt) sought to recover from Peter T. Pederson (Mr. Beechey) a sum of £W 10s as commission on the sale of the lease in perpetuity of a farm in the Urenui district, Upper Waitara. The plaintiff stated that he was a land agent carrying on business at Hawera. He received authority from defendant to sell his lease in perpetuity of 000 acres. He found a buyer named G. Hunt, who, when told the pi ice, made a lower offer. Witness, Hunt, and Pederson went to the office of Messrs. Welsh, McCarthy and Beechey, and an agreement between Hunt and Pederson was drawn up. Witness was informed that, Mr. Ashworth was the landlord, and that there would be no difficulty about getting his consent to the transfer. This was the first time he had heard Ashworth's name. Pederson assured him that there would be no difficulty in putting the sale through if a buyer was obtained. Hunt top!; possession and paid a deposit of £OOO. By March, 1920, Hunt had left the place, and it became necessary to put the lease up by auction. Witness had sent accounts for commission to defendant several times, and he had, while taking exception to the claim for full commission, admitted that witness was entitled to something. By Mr. Beechey: He was charging 2% per cent, on £2700. Pederson said he had been told by a returned soldier that there would be no difficulty about the transfer. The discussion did not take place before the authority was signed. He did not know that Pederson was not the absolute owner of the he knew that a third signature Was required. Witness was not shown a letter by a firm of Feilding solicitors, in which it was stated that the third party would sign. Nothing entered into the mind of witness to upset his calculation that there would be no difficulty about the signature. Mr. Beechey: Would you expect to receive a commission in the event of the Laud Board refusing to consent to the transfe'r? Witness: In that case he would have to leave himself in the hands of Pederson. The form of authority was to sell, and he held that he had sold, though (here was no transfer. The Magistrate reserved his decision,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19200902.2.64

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 2 September 1920, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
406

CLAIM FOR COMMISSION. Taranaki Daily News, 2 September 1920, Page 6

CLAIM FOR COMMISSION. Taranaki Daily News, 2 September 1920, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert