Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

HOME RULE.

BILL. IN THE COMMONS. SINGLE PARLIAMENT REJECTED, By Telegraph.—Press Assn.—Copyright. London, May 10. The House of Commons has entered the committee stage on the Home Rule Bill.

Before the discussions opened the chairman ruled out a number of amendments embodying alternative schemes as equivalent to negatives of the Bill, -but permitted Mr Asquith to move an amendment providing for a single Irish Parliament with county option for Ulster for a limited period of six years on the lines of the 1914 Act.

Mr. Asquith maintained that the duplication of Parliaments, executives and judiciaries gave every opportunity for friction. The Government's plan was not countenanced by any section of Irish opinion and would not be a steppingstone to Irish unity. Mr. Bonar Law emphatically asserted that 21-IV. Asquith did not realise all that had happened during the last six years. While it was true that Irish members had not voted on the Government's Bill it was equally true that they would have opposed Mr. Asquith's proposal. Ulster's attitude was an immence advance on that of 1914. Whereas Ulster then insisted on exclusion it now accepted local Government for the whole of Ireland. Mr. Bonar Law stressed the extent to which they had suffered from uninformed foreign and Dominion comment, which asked: Why not let Ireland govern herself? If the Government's proposal was adopted we could say to Ireland and the world: "We have given you as generous a measure of local Government as we think possible on conditions which mean that the moment Irishmen can agree among themselves they can have it completely in one Parliament." The Government's object was to make unity easier.

Sir Edward Carson regarded the six year proposal as retrograde and impracticable. Although lie detested the idea of breaking up the Parliament of the United Kingdom he pledged himself in the interests of the attempt at the peace of Ulster to do his best to work its Parliament if it were enacted.

Mr Asquith's amendment was defeated by 259 votes to 55,—Imperial Service.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19200513.2.43

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 13 May 1920, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
338

HOME RULE. Taranaki Daily News, 13 May 1920, Page 5

HOME RULE. Taranaki Daily News, 13 May 1920, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert