SUPREME COURT.
DOCTOR'S CLAIM DISPUTED. By Telegraph—Press Association. Christchurch, Nov. 22. In the Supreme Court before Mr. Justice Herdman, William Whitta appealed against a decision of Mr. Hollings, S.M., ordering him to pay 12 guineas to Dr. u'Brien, throat specialist, for an operation performed on appellant's son, ( 'a minor. Appellant said he was absent in Sydney when the operation was performed at the suggestion of his son's music teacher. He was not consulted and claimed to have repudiated liability when informed of the occurrence. Counsel for respondent said appellant was a successful bookmaker who admitted making £4OOO a year out of an illegal profession. His Honor: "The police don't seem to be paying him much attention." Counsel contended that appellant had not formally repudiated responsibility, and that under the circumstances he should be compelled to pay. His Honor said appellant's action was extraordinary and shabby. He should have paid the account. The case, however, must be decided on legal grounds. The appeal was allowed with costs £3 3s.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19191124.2.61
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, 24 November 1919, Page 6
Word count
Tapeke kupu
168SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, 24 November 1919, Page 6
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.