Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

STRANGE BIGAMY CASE.

"A SMiLL MORAL OFFENCE."

MARRIED LIFE THAT OXI.Y LASTED TWO HOURS.

An extraordinary case of bigamy came before the Wellington Supreme Court on Tuesday (reports the Times), when George William Goocli and Ada Rosina Stokes were charged with bigamy at Timaru in March, 1009. Both jileaded guilty. Mr H. F. O'Leary. who appeared for accused, said the history of tlie case showed that in March, 1007, accused Stokes was married. Her husband parted with her two hours after the marriage ceremony. She was then thrown on to the world, anil did her best to maintain herself. She met Goocli, who sympathised with her in her misfortune. They lived together, and later, as Stokes was about to give birth to a child they "decided that for the child's sake they would go through the form of marriage. •Subsequent to this the woman's first husband took divorce proceedings, so that if the two accused had waited the marriage would have been quite in order. After their marriage Goocli and Stokes went to Pttane, and were living there very happily when their offence was discovered. Their case differed very much from the ordinary case of bigamy. They had gone to the Registrar-General to see if they could be legally married now, and as soon as they were informed that every legal impediment was removed the marriage would take place. The husband wished it understood that ho had persuaded Stokes to go through the form of marriage with him.

Mr Justice Edwards said that lie was not disposed to view the offence as a serious one. When a man deceived an innocent girl into marriage then bigamy was a serious offence. The present case was a very small moral offence. While he would treat accused leniently, he would have to impose some small penalty to show 'that the law could not be ignored. Accused would be fined £3 each. Mr O'Leary said he would undertake to see that the money was paid. Accused were discharged accordingly.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19180521.2.15

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 21 May 1918, Page 3

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

STRANGE BIGAMY CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 21 May 1918, Page 3

STRANGE BIGAMY CASE. Taranaki Daily News, 21 May 1918, Page 3

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert