Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PARLIAMENT.

WAR PENSIONS BILL. ALLOWANCE FOR CHILDREN. By Telegraph.—Press Association, Wellington, Last Night. The House of Representatives net «t| 2.30 p.m. The Invercargill Athenaeum and the Mangawhero County Bills were read a first time.

An amendment was introduced Governors message to the War Pensions Amendment Bill, providing for an increase in the amount for children from ■ 5s to 7s (Id per week, Mr, Massey Mid that another amendment to be proposed was that widows with inoomes of £flOtt yearly would not be entitled to a pension, but their children would receive pensions. The Bill was then considered in cofa« nrittee, and discussion on the lines. o£ | the second reading debate followed. The motion for the reading of the first ' clause lasted until the 6.30 adjourn-: - inent. - .<

In reply to objections, Mi. Allen pointed out that the pensions proposed were - . s insuperably superior to those offered by ' Australia, also that it might tie possible to further improve them after thq war, when the full responsibility bad been » ascertained. '

Mr. Ell remarked that he thought the country was wealthy enougli to do more . in regard to pensions than it wag doing. Mr. Witty asked what right tfhoy ihad to conscript married men unless they were prepared to make full provision for theift wives and families in case ot ' death or disablement. Mr. Webb strongly argued in favor of more liberal pension#, i Mr. Brown made a strong appeal that lie pension for widows should be increased. and urged a further .increase of death duties to bo devoted to widows. He regretted haggling over an extra five shillings for women deprived oitheir husbands by the war. 1 Mr. Massey said the Government *a» • not being treated fairly by the discussion. He suggested that the Bill be alloweO to go on, as amendments could be made, if necessary, in committee. Tt they wanted further time for ool»idera« tion let progress Ibe reported. .wj At 9.30 the first clause was passed in Clause 9. , .iv. An amendment, which was proposed ■ by the Minister, debarring widows with incomes of £6OO per year from' receiv- * ing pensions, was agreed to. A new clause was proposed providing that a person of notoriously bad char- , acter should be refused a pension. Mr. Massey agreed to have the clause worded to meet certain representations by members. The remainder of the Bill was panei, The House rose at 10.45 p.m. . !j

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19160526.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, 26 May 1916, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
400

PARLIAMENT. Taranaki Daily News, 26 May 1916, Page 5

PARLIAMENT. Taranaki Daily News, 26 May 1916, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert