LAND AGGREGATION.
A CROWN LANDS CASE. jf s- By Telegraph.—Per Press Association i 0 Palmerston N., Feb. 26. In the action in th 0 Supreme Court, Lands Department v. C. E. Vile, of Bulls, to compel the transfer of certain lands acquired under the Land Act, 1912, the i, Department's counsel said a settlement S. had been arrived at. Vile had purchased ■ a section in the Oliakea settlement, !0 . which he was not entitled to do, as at that time he was the holder of other settlement land. Vile satisfied the Department that he acted bona fide cind in ignorance of the law. (He had since i, transferred the section to a person legal,s lv entitled to hold it. Th(« Department t agreed to withdraw the action, but was nnxioin that the public- should realise the restrictions a gain-it aggregation of Crown or settlement lands, also that the Department was determined to enforce s them in every case,
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19150301.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 224, 1 March 1915, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
158LAND AGGREGATION. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 224, 1 March 1915, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in