THE BOWRON BROS.' CASE.
_«. ——- VTiVHIKU CLAIMS. F.y Christchnvch, Last Night. In the case of Ihmth and Co. v. ISowrau lire,?, the defendants (Mcsr.s liowr.m Ilrop.) have filed a counter-claim, m which tli.-v claim f'Wiim damages, allcein- that liooth and Co.. I.<m-_ don, failed to safely keep defendantskin, ami to obtain tm-f receipts for fkins which in the course of business were handed to them hv liooth and (•>. lor treatment. Defendants are therelore seeking to throw upon Booth and Co. the responsibility for losses arising from the l'hoeiih wharf frauilin respect of -.vhich .Mm Allen Hrown | and .1. 1.. K'lihih!. wharf manager, were j convicted on char;.'.-- of conspiray at the Central Criminal Curt. London, m Jul v. Hill. Apparently these losses arc the" same as Messrs liooth in their stateBlent of claim allege defendants to be I liable for. I ..
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19140718.2.37
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 49, 18 July 1914, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
140THE BOWRON BROS.' CASE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVII, Issue 49, 18 July 1914, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.