Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

UNKNOWN

THE UKSOPHISTICATEri ffifl COURT AGAINST LAND K T"ff| By Telegraph—l'reu A Wellington, Lu&f§l At the Supreme Court tMMgfl Chief Justice gave judgment 4H| tion in which Millicent HoweijPl William James Howell, (if asked for a writ of tnandiqnwSH the Ikaroa Maori Lend BomJOhJ firm a memorandum of tTMutafOf tain land at Paraparaumu, franl Ngarara to herself. About twin of 1012, a native, Tcira N»ras|§|| to sell a piece of land at P«r»s|m and approachod the husband i§§| tiff then lessee of the land,'i«ffl purpose. Following that, attjW ment was made to sell the, laili|9| Howell, who, as part of the -mM money, was to buy tbe pie«e OHjfij longing to Mr Wade, and trinSra the native. The latter to the native's, and wag duly imM by plaintiff in performance dcrtnkimr. A transfer in the tMM duly consented to bv the natiiw in December, 1912, was COttqjn| the defendant board, subject 4Jj£§fi conditions. Plaintiff intimated Taj ingness to comply with thews t.ions, but application was hlh for a rehearing. This toolfHljj June, 1013. the native (who (tyjfjH tend the first hearing), taltt£fi| nnd the application was llu' result that the Board dmK not to grant confirmation. , 'Jffl therefore applied for a writVJH damns under section 220 of tnffil Land Act, 100!). compelling tttßl to confirm the transfer. W| For the defence it was CO&tdufl the native could not make afjjl to sell, un'css the Maori T*aH was satisfied that it was mM his interest, and the defcndafflß was disinclined to confirm. arrangement for that P ur P oS^^H His Honor held that to »»J3m| to become a speculator in toIMJM would l>e absurd, and to injftfcflM into land exchange transaetiMH hud been so injurious to njlgfl lionns, as actions in recent W(n| the Court hid mnde the C«| quaintcil with, would be itill. He therefore saw no *flH setlintr the judgment of jffi| Indeed, if the Board had confln transnetion, it would not, in B »jffl opinion, have been doing itajwH| application was dismissed,

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19140328.2.52

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVI, Issue 257, 28 March 1914, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
334

UNKNOWN Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVI, Issue 257, 28 March 1914, Page 5

UNKNOWN Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVI, Issue 257, 28 March 1914, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert