SUGGESTION OF COLLUSION IN DIVORCE SUIT. Gisbonie, Last Night. In the Divorce Court, decree.'! nisi, to be made absolute in three months, were granted in the following cases: —Margaret Magnussen v. Hurry Magnussen, desertion, interim custody of the children to the petitioner; Margaret Barlow v. William John Harlow, misconduct, custody of the child to petitioner. Tn the last case His Honor slid he would make an order for costs against the respondent on the highest scale. Mr Burnard, for petitioner, said an order was hardly necessary, as the question of costs had been arranged with the respondent's solicitor. Tlis Honor: But why such an arrangement? Surely it is unusual in a divorce case? Mr Burnard: Very well, your Honor, I will take an order. His Honor: No; I will not make an order at all. I don't think those arrangements should be made. The Soli-citor-General may make nn enquiry. He may interfere even now. They liove to remove any suggcstioi of collusion. His Honor subsequently made an or- ' der for costs on tlie highest scale.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19140324.2.55.4
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVI, Issue 253, 24 March 1914, Page 5
Word count
Tapeke kupu
175Page 5 Advertisements Column 4 Taranaki Daily News, Volume LVI, Issue 253, 24 March 1914, Page 5
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Log in