Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE'S COURT.

Tim usual mlling of the Magistrate's Court was held yeestorday morning before Mr. A. Crooke, S..VI. A DAXGKROUS BULL. Frederick Cassidy was ciiarged, on the information of the Borough Inspector, (Mr. Tippins), with having permitted a bull over nine month's old to be at * large within the borough boundaries. Defendant pleaded guilty, but stated, in extenuation, that the animal had not been loose before. Someone, he thought, must have opened the paddock gate, and s let it out. The Inspector considered the bu'l a dangerous animal. It li>v<l been rwng about the road. It had routed four cyclists, -and when he was taking it u> the pound, had seriously frightened a i young lady, who had to c-imb over a wire f'liec to esenpe. \ fine of 10s and costs 7s vns hr-nosed. m.'KAC'H OF FA'TOKIKS ACT Johnson Bros., who pleaded guilty, were charged by the Inspector of Factories (Mr. W. Slaughter) with having employed an assistant after 8 pan. on one working day in the week. A fine of 10s and costs Ts was imposed. A SCAFFOLDING CASE. 'Alfred Boon was charged by the Inspector of Factories with having erected a scaffolding exceeding 16 feet in height without having previously notified 1 the Inspector. Mr. J. H. Sullivan, who appeared for defendant, stated that Mr. Griffiths, of Bell Block, had wished to engage Boon ; Bros, to build a silo. This, however, was not possible, but he was able to senure two of defendant's workmen* to help build the silo. He submitted that the owr">r should have been served with the notice by the Inspector. The men were not actually working for Boon • Bros., who had nothing to do with the work either by contract or supervision, but were lent to Mr. Griffiths, who con- . trolled the work. The ladder referred to in the second charge was a fixture, and not a ladder in the ordinary sense of the term. 11 Mr. Slaughter said that defendants I were undoubtedly responsible, for they were naying the wages of the two men, 'and if an accident had oociirred they would have been responsible for the insurance. _ _ After hearing the evidence his Worship siid that he would have to. dismiss the ! nformation. It was evident the TnsnnM-r lnd been misled in regard *.o the the notice. A second ehsrge was withdrawn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19130516.2.60

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 304, 16 May 1913, Page 8

Word count
Tapeke kupu
389

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 304, 16 May 1913, Page 8

MAGISTRATE'S COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 304, 16 May 1913, Page 8

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert