INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION.
THE PRIME- MINISTER'S PROMISES.(By Telegraph.—Own Correspondent). Wellington, Last Nights. A claim for a six days' \vcck:'foir hotel employees excited a good deal iof !discus : sion.in the House to-day, and so|me re-, marks l>y Mr. Veitch gave the; ! Prime' Minister an opportunity to decjilre the attitude of the Government on .this and" other matters. Mr. Veitch said tjirtil'-thfe' whole issue was a six-ilnv week, j -Et'tflitt not involve a-reduction of fcwp? hours a week. Tim Prime .Minister liakl.stated that, he had delayed. labor,legislation on account'btbhfeindustrial unrest. He considered this,-wan I just the reason why Parliament slicmld' vgaji-,* aider the. matter, which was of griive national I ■<■;■ >] ) In replying'to Mr. Veitch. tliej .Pinnae,, Minister said that lie wished to tell -mo.m-; hers this: That not a single day; passed,,' without 20 or more memhers were _.si 4 ie}f'ing him up in the lobby and asking ; tjiiir when the session was going tb'e'nd., : He\ did not like to accuse the last speaker of misrepresentation, but when: he referred to a statement by the speaker he conveyed the impression that the'' 'Go-' vernment did not 'want to brink down the Bill till the present industrial crisis i had ended. When the session opened he * '3iatl'ft : BHl prepared in whichlit [wasjjifjl' j tended to alter the constitution! of the I : . Arbitration Court. Wlien tlie cfcis bejf came acute he came to the conclusion
A tlia r t the time was not opportune'to pro.'-; ! oe'ed' 'with the '"proposed change, and lie i did not propose to ask Parliament .utti.. (j alter the lav? till things looked n gfrfaif, S deal .better. . On the other partj of J the | Bill memberswould" probab|y liavewtlKt' j "opportunity of voting before the! erf no, 6 'the 'seSsioih : :With regard to tlje.'hafcelr employees. the' Bill .proviffed'fqr six jday&, work with (jiie holiday in sevKhj ifoom.(liflerent''parts' of the oou-ntVy. jfrei had received applications asking foi\ aijinojir. "portuhity. to 'give evidence on\tlißvßiliL,j I lie' knew' that the subject 'ha'ck'beeiinen.-i; I quired, into in the past, but-'n < e\y-.fctodi-< j 'ti'ons had arisen, and 'he -would iiotlbei it . justified in refusing the evidence thaitJ ift'-
iV terested parties proposed tb'tifidc«<ilf:i*t u' was not necessary to take eyideVicejilih.QW!! [j would be no difficulty in getting'the.il,<\gti ' on the Statute Book this .session^:cMvvi g Veitcli had said that lie was not-wtfaviJ i our of strikes. He agreed with: him,: , and 'said'that 1 he wished, to refer- to.t'he,' * cause of the-present trouble at Waih&.j The trouble was due to the facjt .that.* large -number of me» refused to .takftjad-. vantage of the -present industrial .lagis-; lation. They cancelled their registration,, and that was the origin of the present •difficulty. Had it not been so tW:T*re- : sent difficulty would not have' occurred "It will." he said, in conclusion, "be : our business —our duty—to make' our fir dustrial legislation far more attractive to the employers of the country and tlie workers of the country."
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19121017.2.52
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 128, 17 October 1912, Page 7
Word count
Tapeke kupu
485INDUSTRIAL LEGISLATION. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LV, Issue 128, 17 October 1912, Page 7
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.