Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE SUFFRAGETTES.

While we cannot but admire the pluck and determination of the twenty-three suffragettes who have just obtained their release from Holloway prison by resorting to the "hunger strike," we may be pardoned for drawing attention to some of the possibilities opened up by the precedent thus established. These ladies claim the right to be treated as first-class political prisoners, and- to be free to receive visitors, peruse books and newspapers sent to them by friends, arrange for a siipply of meals from outside sources, and, in fact, to enjoy every privilege except the one of unrestricted liberty. The authorities, .rightly or wrongly, have decided that the offences of these prisoners arc not of a political character, and have sought to inflict upon them the punishment meted out to those who are convicted of assault and battery or malicious damage to property. This uncompromising attitude has been met by an equally uncompromising refusal on the part of.the militant suffragettes to partake of nutriment during their sojourn behind prison bars, with the result that the authorities have seen fit to give tlieni their freedom. If the "hunger strike" is thus tacitly accepted by the Government as a valid reason for release it mar prove difficult to prevent the extension of the precedent to prisoners who have, found their way into durance vile by committing offences which were not prompted by any political motive. The amiable gentleman who has been incarcerated for brutally assaulting his wife and the inebriate who has shown his resentment against expulsion from a public-house by sending a volley of road metal through the windows of the hostelry may feel aggrieved if their firm refusal to consume their daily rations does not also cause the locks, bolts, and bars to fly open. Of course, we are not so ungallant as to suggest that the Holloway authorities should have been instructed to allow their suffragette charges to test the fasting doctrines expounded by Mr. Jack London. The position is that the British Goyernment has regarded these ladies as criminal offenders, and has released them without admitting their claims to be considered anything better. Should the strike" become a prominent feature -of life in his Majesty's .prisons the precedent, even though made "without prejudice," may lead to some peculiar dilemmas in future.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19120702.2.17

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 314, 2 July 1912, Page 4

Word count
Tapeke kupu
383

THE SUFFRAGETTES. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 314, 2 July 1912, Page 4

THE SUFFRAGETTES. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 314, 2 July 1912, Page 4

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert