SUPREME COURT.

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 210, 4 March 1912, Page 7

SUPREME COURT.

' CASES SET DOWN FOR HEARING. Quite a number of cases are set down for hearing at the sitting of the Supreme Court at New Plymouth, which .opens to-morrow. The criminal cases are as follow:—Te Kira, alleged breaking and entering warehouse and theft therefrom; C. B. Lumsden, jun., alleged indecent assault; W. J. Roes, alleged theft from a dwelling; W. Ryan, alleged theft from person; T. McMillan, alleged detaining postal packet; Saunders, alleged attempted theft from person.« The civil cases comprise:—Quin Bro*. (Mr. Halliwell) v. South Taranaki Winter Show Company, claim under Wages Protection and Contractors' Act, 1908; Bennett and Sutton (Mr. R. D. Welsh) v. the same; Rasmus Anderson (Mr. Stanford) v. 'John George Buchanan (Mr. Anderson), seduction claim £5Ol (before a common jury of twelve); James George Johnston (Mr. G. Hutchison) v. John O'Donnell (Mr. Halliwell), claim for £IOOO damages alleged libel; -Moms''Carr'Robinson (Mr. Nicholson) 'v. Henry Sanson, jun. (Mr. Stanford), specific performance of an agreement for exchange of farm lands; Llewellyn Davy (Mr. Barton) v. EmmaL. McGregor "(Mr. Sellar), claim for £2OO 12s 6d for money allegedly lent and interest; Trustees of the. will of Henry A. Arthur- (Mr. Barton) v. Alfred H. Arthur (Mr. G. H. Ryan), claim for £llO2 17s 7d under memo of mortgage; John Armstrong (Mr. McCarthy) and another v. John M. Laurent, claim for £ll3B lis 9d damages for alleged fraudulent representation on sale of land (before common jury of twelve); Charles Robert StannaTd (Mr. McCarthy) v. Harold A. Jones (Mr. Sellar), claim £lO3 10s, for alleged breach of agreement, arrears of salary and accounts; Edward J. Bergin (Mr. Gray) v. Edwin May (Mr. F. 'E. Wilson), claim in detinue for £400; Charles Weston (Mr. C. H. Weston) t. | Francis M. Mills (Mr. G. Grey), claim for £IOO commission on sale of land.

The following ca6es will be heard i» Banco: R. C. James (Mr. Clarke) v. executors of the will of Mary James (Mr. H. C. Adams), claim for an order under the Family Protection Aet, 1908; Amelia Kay (Mr. Dix) v. executors of the will of Elizabeth de La Roche (Mr. Nicholson), claim for order under the Declaratory Judgments Act; Catherine Cameron (Mr. R. G. Sellar) t. Public Trustee and others) claim for an erder under part 2 of the Family Protection Aet; Lafavette Keith (Mr. A. 11. Johnstone)' v. Albert E. Callow (Mr. C. H. Weston), an appeal from the- Magistrate's Court; John N. Hamlyn (Mr. O'Dea) v. Lulu U. Hamlyn, dissolution of marriage (no appearance entered). Casew in chambers will be as follows: —Amelia Kay (Mr. Dix) v. executors and trustees of the will of Elizabeth Dc La Roche (Mr. Nicholson), summons for dismissal of 'oritrinatins? summons; Morris C. Robison (Mr. Nicholson) v. Henry Sanson, jun. (Mr. Stanford), summon* for further particulars; Lafayette Keith, appellant (Mr. Johnstone) v. Albert E. Callow, respondent (Mr. C. H. Weston), summons for an order that appeal be by way of rehearing; re the Companies Act, 1908, and the Cape Egmont Co-operative Dairy Company, Ltd. (Mr. _ Quilliam). petition for confirmation of alienation of tha memo. of «eoei»>tiMi :f *. {]■ ii,!4,.-i