Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PERSIA.

CHARGES REFUTED. By Cable— Press Association—Copyright. London, February 22. Mr. Ponsonby moved an amendment to the Address-in-Reply, condemning the Government's failure to preserve the integrity of Persia. Sir Edward Grey refuted the charge that Britain's strategic interests were damaged. Some Russian troops had already beeniVithdrawn. and the- Government was assured that the rest would follow. Russia was also entitled to defend her strategical interests. The Anglo-Russian agreement limited the action of btfth Power-. Russia's influence in Northern Persia was unaffected. as it existcjl, prior to the agreement. The amendment was withdrawn.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19120224.2.24

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 203, 24 February 1912, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
92

PERSIA. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 203, 24 February 1912, Page 5

PERSIA. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 203, 24 February 1912, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert