Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BOROUGH BY-LAW CASE

A COUNCILLOR PROSECUTED. At the S.M. Court yesterday morning Inspector Tippins proceeded against George Wilfrid Hartnell, a builder, and a member of tOxe Borough Council, on a. charge of having caused a load of timber to be placed in Devon street without (having placed lights thereon at night a* his own 'expense from Saturday, July 8, to Tuesday, July 11. Mr. F. E. Wilson appeared for the defendant, who pleaded not guilty. Inspector Tippins gave evidence that on Monday evening, 10th met., he visited Dawson street and: found the load of timber tJiere without lights on it. He telephoned to the town clerk, who instructed luim to put lights on the timber. t He did this. Next morning he found that the timber had been moved to the section 1 , and the tamps placed on one aide. He was informed by one of the builders that Hartnell was the owner of Khe timber. Mr. Wilson ?'iid the inspector's evidence was quite correct. The defence was that the defendant was the wrong man to proceed against. Hartnell had a contract to build a hoine foT Mr. H. Calvert, and ordered timber from the flfcush and Door Company. The timber came, but the driver of the waggon placed it on the road instead- of on the section, although there was no difficulty about putting it on to the site. The defendant . received no notice of the delivery of the timber, and had absolutely no knowledge that it was- lying in the streeit. When informed of it, be went down at night and moved it on to the section. Defendant's evidence was to thiis effect, saying that there was some 1405 ft. of timber, and that foe moved it (hini«elf. He had never had' timber delivered in thin way before. "The company had verbally undertook to notify him when the timber was delivered'.

His Worship held that there was no evidence to show that the defendant hlwi caused 1 the timber to be placed on the road, or even that he knew it was there. The information would be dismissed.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110721.2.60

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 23, 21 July 1911, Page 6

Word count
Tapeke kupu
350

BOROUGH BY-LAW CASE Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 23, 21 July 1911, Page 6

BOROUGH BY-LAW CASE Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIV, Issue 23, 21 July 1911, Page 6

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert