SUPREME COURT.
NEW PLYMOUTH SESSIONS. I The New Plymouth sessions will open I to-morrow morning at 11 o'clock, before I Mr. Justice Edwards. The list of oases is lengthy, and, a§ the Court will hardly | sit on Coronation Day, night sittings will .probably be necessary if the session is to end this week . Of course some of the civil cases may not come on for hearing. The list is as follows: CRIMINAL CASES. Rex v. Albert Edward Madgwiek, a charge of cattle-stealing. Rex v. Lewis John Pepperell, charged I .with carnally knowing a girl under sii- j teen years of age. Rex v. Alexander Blue, a charge of house-breaking at Ilawera. J Rex v. Munga Wainonga, a charge of breaking and entering a shop -at Okaiawa and committing theft. CIVIL CASES. Quin Bros. (Mr. Halliwell) v. South Taranaki Winter Show Company, Ltd., and Robert William Bond and Bond's trustees, a claim under the Wages Protection and Contractors Liens Act, 1908, for £486 16s 7d. Bennett and Sutton (Mr. R. D. Welsh) v. the same, a, similar claim, for £303 12s 4d. W. Humphries v. Westport Coal Company, Ltd., claim for £IOOO damages for injuries received by being knocked down by a cart and horse belonging to defendant company (to be heard 'before a common jury). Willie Greenwood (Mr. Spenee) v. Wm. Schmit and Wm. Bellshaw (Mr. QuilKam), claim' for £271 compensation for deficiency of grass lands involved in a sale of property at Okau. Joseph Henry Slight v. Charles Arnold and Lucy Hannah Arnold, claim .for refund of a deposit of £SO paid under an agreement for sale of land and stock and for £230 1.3s 2d loss and damages suffered in consequence of alleged reI cision of the contract.
George Maginnora v. Karl A. Zurcher and Alf Zurcher, claim for £135 damages for breach of warranty on a sale of ca,ttle.
Rasmus Anderson v. John George Buchanan, da/irn for €5Ol damages for seduction of plaintiff's daughter (to be heard before a common jury). Marv Ann Or ay v. Benjamin Gray, as administrators of the estate of Benjamin Gray, deceased, and Elizabeth Greenlees, action in detinue for possession; of certain catt]<! or for £313 in case: possession cannot be had, and' £2O damages. DIVORCE. Augustus Cameron v. Daisy Cameron and Harold Kirk. IN BANCO. Re the Law Practitioners Act. 1 !K)8, and a solicitor, motion for rule nisi -to strike off the roll of solicitors. William George Malone v. Henry Samuel Fitzherbert, Registrar of the Supreme Court, motion for a writ of mandamus.
Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110619.2.7
Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka
Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 331, 19 June 1911, Page 2
Word count
Tapeke kupu
423SUPREME COURT. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 331, 19 June 1911, Page 2
Using this item
Te whakamahi i tēnei tūemi
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Taranaki Daily News. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International licence (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0). This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.