Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ALLEGED WRONGFUL DISMISSAL

BY CUSTOMS OFFICE. By Telegraph.—Press Association. Wellington, Last Night. An action against the Crown by Arthur Broad Reynolds, late landing waiter for the Customs Department at Auckland, for £3OOO damages for alleged wrongful dismissal, wa3 commenced this afternoon before Mr. Jastice Siin and a common ' ]uw of twelve. The ease came before the court as a petition under the Crown Suits Act. -Mr. R. B. Williams, with Mr. G. fl. Fell, appeared for Reynolds, and Mr. J. W. Salniond (Solietor-General) and with him Mr. A. W. Blair for the Crown. Petitioner, in Ms statement of claim, set fortli that he had been in the public service some twenty-six years, and that at the time of his msmissal on December 14th, 1009, he was in receipt of a salary of 1300 per annum. On June Ist, 1909, owing to ill-health, he went te Auckland (allegedly without leave) under medical advice, and on June 10th he was suspended, and a letter was sent to him from the Collector of Customs at Wellington, oharging him with being absent from duty without leave, with insobriety, and with the disobedience or orders. A board of inquiry, consisting of Messrs. J. A. Hutton and W. Bowles, reported on his case in July, and as the result of their report, petitioner was dismissed from tho public service on December 14th. Petitioner urged that the sitting of the Board was illegal and was not consonant with natural justice. In consequence of his dismissal, his health had suffered and he had also lost his claim to compensation. For the defence it was denied that the inquiry was void, but, on the contrary was a proper inquiry. It was also contended that petitioner was guilty of the charges made against him, and was therefore rightfully dismissed from the service. As petitioner complained that he had not had a sufficient inquiry, the Government offered him a new inquiry which was refused. The case had not concluded when the court rose for the day.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110601.2.49

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 316, 1 June 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
335

ALLEGED WRONGFUL DISMISSAL Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 316, 1 June 1911, Page 5

ALLEGED WRONGFUL DISMISSAL Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 316, 1 June 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert