Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

BUTTER v. CHEESE.

.ril [i";e'fTo the Editor. Sijf)p-fTf I !may have a little space in your :ivo)uabJ.e ; .sheet. I shall be obliged, idS'.'l wiish yeply to "Common Sense," whose letter appeared on April 3. He apparently.■so.ujd not, I am sorry to notice, >•%' the- ease of fire, keep cool," while trying to blow out "nutter-fat's" stati'Mfintiini onf{ ;puff. Now, "Common iSeriae"-tb? of dairymen which • yoiVitfefelYvtio/jperliaps, was called by ! myself ion ■Jtwe 15. 1910, and if you were one out of 28. dairymen, and certainly >t)Se most)c(lulJ : ; you thought it was jtforirtWj.pnrpose'.of paying out a bonus, tlK;iir'n(i tlie next best thought a bonus. Evidently ■ i-sujts -to. twist things and misis. only fqr the sake of statement made by me at] "That up to that date thie ij*coj)ii})(ti-;Siles received from Home for export cheese sold showed a decent go towards paying f ,ny 2 d per lb already pajd;foij ;i \Hitter-fat, if the balance of returns welWr'i j .1 quite expect "Common Sense" <}.ijl that,.so I could not expect him rto .remind .that supplier who lie waiting for his bonus." | If this should catch that supplier's eye, ,li]o,4'oujiit on me, when I shall hays;.siuch,'p!/Basme in allowing him to |, ejainine „.tbosp documents. T hope, • .wljgy 'ifXJainnioiy Sense" quotes ''Butteri -fat's." statements •,again, that lie will be •' )«.-* will find it quite useless ,to try. pnd mislead smarter brains .thain'-.h.is own, as he no doubt, intends, hy sayidg om! clieese factory had reduced •its-pries to' Hd, without stating tnat the .otliCf was.gtijl paving ll l /od for butterand,, again, reading between the lines iqf Jiis letter. ''Common Sense" is cvpr aipdo.ns to mislead, this time with words and figures, and his subject the ciiet'semeuV nqd buttennen's tests. Well, if, this is jtho best argument "Common Seusfl''. has,to condemn cheese factories with,. n(jt be misleading your-elf by i/Niigjniftg • that cheese factorv proprietors get birr fat, over-runs and bonuses , OMt <s< s U|>.plir ( 'rs' tests. The proof of this., can .easily be shown, and will be mo.-fci interesting to readers in general bv handinir to the editor the factory te*jt record for the past season, and 1 will do the sn me. and allow them to be .oonipaved; ,or, better still, show from any dairy.concern in the district the net r ?.V'fi),iper cow, taking four or five average -henls, in ,C s. <]., and I will have mueli pleasure m producing the same for the past or present season (factory records only).-—1 am, etc., W. J. XETLSON, Proprietor, "'Royal Oak" Cheese Factory. Omata.

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110405.2.63.3

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 270, 5 April 1911, Page 7

Word count
Tapeke kupu
414

BUTTER v. CHEESE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 270, 5 April 1911, Page 7

BUTTER v. CHEESE. Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 270, 5 April 1911, Page 7

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert