Thank you for correcting the text in this article. Your corrections improve Papers Past searches for everyone. See the latest corrections.

This article contains searchable text which was automatically generated and may contain errors. Join the community and correct any errors you spot to help us improve Papers Past.

Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

REFORM OF THE LORDS

TORY SPLIT DENIED. By Cable—Press Association—Copyright. London, February 28. A meeting of Unionist members ■of Parliament was held to consider the reform of the House of Lords. The alleged split in the ranks is denied. Differences had arisen over the proposed changes, ind there was a complaint by the rank and file that the leaders had not submitted a definite plan. There is every prospect of a settlement. "UTMOST LOYALTY AND CONFI- • DENCE." London, February 28. The official account of the full meeting of Unionist members shows there is the utmost loyalty and confidence in the leaders of the party. Sir Acland Hood, member for Wellington (Somerset), explained the lines of Lord Lansdowne's Bill, which the meeting unanimously and cordially accepted. SPEECH BY MR. BALFOUR. London, February, 28. . In the debate on the Parliament Bill Mr. Balfour declared tttat : reform of the House of Lords was needed, and admitted that no reform would be fair or lasting which stereotyped the Tory majority there. The second Chamber should represent the best elements in the country. The nation would require to know what common ground existed between the two great parties before the Government would be permitted to carry the present Bill by methods of unparalleled violence, even using the Coronation as a weapon in political controversy. NO NEW FEATURES. Received 1, 10.50 p.m. London, March 1. The veto debate was continued without eliciting any new features. Lord Lyttelton and Colonel Seely were the principal speakers. NO COHERENT POLICY. ALLEGED MISLEADING REPORT. Received 2, 12.5 a.m. London, March 1. The Times declares that both the Cabinet and the Unionists are equally destitute of a coherent and generally accepted plan of reform of the Lords. The Times also says that yesterday's official report ,of the Unionist,, meeting was intentionally misleading, and that the meeting was adjourned until par--ticulars o£ Lord Lansdowne's Bill were known. •

Permanent link to this item
Hononga pūmau ki tēnei tūemi

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/TDN19110302.2.28

Bibliographic details
Ngā taipitopito pukapuka

Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 251, 2 March 1911, Page 5

Word count
Tapeke kupu
315

REFORM OF THE LORDS Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 251, 2 March 1911, Page 5

REFORM OF THE LORDS Taranaki Daily News, Volume LIII, Issue 251, 2 March 1911, Page 5

Help

Log in or create a Papers Past website account

Use your Papers Past website account to correct newspaper text.

By creating and using this account you agree to our terms of use.

Log in with RealMe®

If you’ve used a RealMe login somewhere else, you can use it here too. If you don’t already have a username and password, just click Log in and you can choose to create one.


Log in again to continue your work

Your session has expired.

Log in again with RealMe®


Alert